Faith in Contemporary Life

Philosophy or Theology: More Questions or Answers?

By Pastor Chris Cahill · 3 minute read · First published 2024-04-25

Do philosophy and theology give us answers, or better questions? Work through what each brings to the search instead of assuming thinking harder is a threat to believing deeply.

Questions are allowed here

I have developed a deep affection for philosophy and firmly believe in its profound influence on shaping human thought and understanding across the ages. I find myself drawn to Plato's wisdom, yet it was Socrates who aptly remarked, "I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think." While I do not claim to possess the ability to compel others to think, I am convinced that philosophy offers a valuable framework for exploring New Testament Theology along with some of life's most profound questions.

As a Christian, I value what philosophical inquiry brings to reading the New Testament. Questions about ethics, reality, and knowledge help us examine what we mean rather than merely repeat familiar words. The tools are useful. They still need to serve the search for truth instead of becoming an intellectual victory parade.

However, amidst our appreciation for philosophy, it is crucial to heed the biblical warnings regarding the perils of excessive speculation. Colossians 2:8 warns against being "taken captive through philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ" (ESV). This admonition underscores the importance of remaining anchored in the truth of Christ, rather than being led astray solely by human wisdom.

Moreover, the Bible warns against engaging in fruitless arguments and debates over philosophical matters. 1 Timothy 6:20 advises, "…avoid the irreverent babble and contradictions of what is falsely called 'knowledge'" (ESV). Instead of getting entangled in endless disputes, Christians are encouraged to focus on proclaiming the Gospel message and living lives that reflect the love and grace of Christ. In fact, as decent human beings, Christian or otherwise, we should all see respect and understanding over vain arguments.

Put your own assumptions on the table

Confirmation bias has a remarkably convenient habit of making us feel well informed. We notice what supports our view and give the awkward evidence less attention. Before diagnosing that habit in someone else, let us inspect our own reading list.

First Corinthians 13:12 describes present knowledge as partial. Consider whether that recognition could support a more careful hearing of another person’s account. Examining a view does not require accepting it; disagreement can remain specific and respectful.

Christians confess Jesus as the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), while acknowledging the limits of human understanding. Paul’s image of seeing dimly in 1 Corinthians 13:12 offers one biblical way to speak about those limits. We can approach another person with humility without treating our own reading as complete.

Think deeply. Treat people decently.

I want philosophy to help us ask better questions, hear each other more carefully, and deepen our understanding of God and His creation. My anchor remains Christ. A conversation can challenge a belief without humiliating the person who holds it. If our wisdom makes us harder to love, perhaps we have another question to ask.